Jakman

Article Details

Vol. 7 No. 4 (2026): September

Articles

Stakeholder Driven Adoption of E-Catalog Mobile in Indonesian Local Government

M Mira Erviana I Imam Salehudin
01 September 2026 Vol. 7 No. 4 (2026): September https://doi.org/10.35912/jakman.v7.n4.p21-34.2026
Abstract
01 Sep 2026

Purpose: This research investigates the determinants affecting the intention to adopt mobile e-catalogs within local government institutions, highlighting how stakeholder-driven forces construct user viewpoints.
Research Methodology: A quantitative research design was applied utilizing questionnaire responses from 337 procurement officers in the Indonesian local government. Analysis was conducted through PLS-SEM to evaluate an Integrated Technology Organization Environment (TOE) Framework and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM).
Results: The findings show that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use strongly affect the Intention to Adopt. Organizational Readiness indirectly contributes to the Intention to Adopt through the mediation of the system’s perceived ease of use. Stakeholder Demand appears as the primary driver influencing both perceptions, showing that external pressure heavily shapes how users access technology.
Conclusions: The study concludes that in established public digital systems, the adoption of complementary technologies is primarily perception-driven rather than readiness-driven.
Limitations: This study focuses only on procurement officials in local governments and predominantly covers respondents from Western Indonesia. It also examines the intention to adopt rather than actual usage behavior.
Contributions: This research adds to the academic discussion by showing that stakeholder demand influences the intention to adopt technology through the formation of user perceptions, broadening TOE–TAM integration within local government digital transformation.

Keywords: Government Procurement PLS-SEM Public Sector Digital Transformation Stakeholder Demand TAM-TOE
How to Cite
“
Erviana, M., & Salehudin, I. (2026). Stakeholder Driven Adoption of E-Catalog Mobile in Indonesian Local Government. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan, Dan Manajemen, 7(4), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.35912/jakman.v7.n4.p21-34.2026
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
References
  1. Adade, D., & de Vries, W. T. (2025). An extended TOE framework for local government technology adoption for citizen participation: Insights for city digital twins for collaborative planning. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 19(1), 53-73. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-01-2024-0025
  2. Adnan, H. R., Hidayanto, A. N., & Kurnia, S. (2021). Citizens’ or government’s will? Exploration of why indonesia’s local governments adopt technologies for open government. Sustainability, 13(20), 11197. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011197
  3. Alkhaldi, A., Malik, S., & Lytras, M. (2025). Exploring Mobile ID adoption in Kuwait: A TOE framework assessment of e-government and smart city innovations. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-05-2024-0158
  4. Anwar, A. (2018). Pendidikan, kesehatan dan pertumbuhan ekonomi regional di Indonesia: Pendekatan model panel dinamis. Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan, 19(1), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.18196/jesp.19.1.2727
  5. Baker, J. (2011). The technology–organization–environment framework. Information Systems Theory: Explaining and Predicting Our Digital Society, Vol. 1, 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2_12
  6. Changalima, I. A., Rejeb, A., & Kimario, H. F. (2026). PLS-SEM in public procurement research: A systematic review of theoretical foundations, constructs and empirical insights. Journal of Public Procurement, 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-06-2025-0056
  7. Chatterjee, S., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Baabdullah, A. M. (2021). Understanding AI adoption in manufacturing and production firms using an integrated TAM-TOE model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, 120880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120880
  8. Chia, A., & Agustin, I. N. (2026). Factor Influencing Decision Making to Adopt Cross-Border E-Commerce. Studi Akuntansi, Keuangan, dan Manajemen, 5(4), 49-65. https://doi.org/10.35912/sakman.v5i4.5819
  9. Chittipaka, V., Kumar, S., Sivarajah, U., Bowden, J. L.-H., & Baral, M. M. (2023). Blockchain Technology for Supply Chains operating in emerging markets: An empirical examination of Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework. Annals of Operations Research, 327(1), 465-492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04801-5
  10. Chomistriana, D., Mulyono, A. T., & Najid. (2024). Predicting adoption behaviour to digital government transformation in construction sector. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04801-5
  11. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  12. Deng, Z., Hong, Z., Ren, C., Zhang, W., & Xiang, F. (2018). What predicts patients’ adoption intention toward mHealth services in China: Empirical study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 6(8). https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.9316
  13. Esfahbodi, A., Pang, G., & Peng, L. (2022). Determinants of consumers' adoption intention for blockchain technology in E-commerce. Journal of Digital Economy, 1(2), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdec.2022.11.001
  14. Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: A comparison of four procedures. Internet research, 29(3), 430-447. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2017-0515
  15. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.).
  16. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook.
  17. Haripin, H., & Fatmawati, S. (2026). Analysis of determinants of fintech adoption by MSMEs in Balikpapan City: DOI and TAM Approaches. Studi Akuntansi, Keuangan, dan Manajemen, 5(3), 271-288. https://doi.org/10.35912/sakman.v5i3.5777
  18. Hashim, N., Samsuri, A. S., & Idris, N. H. (2021). Assessing organisations' readiness for technological changes in construction industry. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 12(1), 130-139. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2021.12.01.013
  19. Hidayati, A., Yudimamase, A. R., & Stiawan, H. (2025). TAM to measure electric motorcycle adoption interest in West Kalimantan. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan, dan Manajemen, 7(1), 235-255. https://doi.org/10.35912/jakman.v7i1.5347
  20. Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Laptops in the K-12 classrooms: Exploring factors impacting instructional use. Computers & Education, 55(3), 937-944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.002
  21. Iqbal, M. (2020). Pengaruh pelaksanaan e katalog dalam pengadaan barang/jasa pemerintah terhadap UMKM. Jurnal USM Law Review, 3(1), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v3i1.2204
  22. Jais, R., & Ngah, A. H. (2024). The moderating role of government support in chatbot adoption intentions among Malaysian government agencies. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 18(3), 417-433. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-02-2023-0026
  23. Janssen, M., Rana, N. P., Slade, E. L., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). Trustworthiness of digital government services: Deriving a comprehensive theory through interpretive structural modelling. Digital Government and Public Management, 15–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1305689
  24. Jöhnk, J., Weißert, M., & Wyrtki, K. (2021). Ready or not, ai comes an interview study of organizational AI readiness factors: J. Jöhnk et al.: Ready or Not, AI Comes: An Interview Study of Organizational AI Readiness Factors. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 63(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-020-00676-7
  25. Kumar, J., Rani, M., Rani, G., & Rani, V. (2025). Unveiling employee readiness for artificial intelligence adoption: Empirical insight from the perspective of the banking sector. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-08-2023-0130
  26. Legesse, A., Beshah, B., Berhan, E., & Tesfaye, E. (2024). Exploring the influencing factors of blockchain technology adoption in national quality infrastructure: A Dual-Stage structural equation model and artificial neural network approach using TAM-TOE framework. Cogent Engineering, 11(1), 2369220. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2024.2369220
  27. Limanto, S., & Wuisan, D. S. S. (2025). Antecedents of mobile JKN satisfaction and continuance in Surabaya. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan, dan Manajemen, 7(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.35912/jakman.v7i1.4772
  28. Mercuri, F., Quaglieri, L., Ramírez-Hurtado, J. M., & Quattrociocchi, B. (2025). Technological, organizational and environmental determinants influencing the intention to adopt GEN-AI of public sector organizations: A cross-country comparative analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-03-2025-0359
  29. Mikalef, P., Lemmer, K., Schaefer, C., Ylinen, M., Fjørtoft, S. O., Torvatn, H. Y., Gupta, M., & Niehaves, B. (2022). Enabling AI capabilities in government agencies: A study of determinants for European municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), 101596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101596
  30. Modisane, P., & Jokonya, O. (2021). Evaluating the benefits of cloud computing in Small, Medium and Micro-Sized Enterprises (SMMEs). Procedia Computer Science, 181, 784–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.231
  31. Nuryyev, G., Wang, Y.-P., Achyldurdyyeva, J., Jaw, B.-S., Yeh, Y.-S., Lin, H.-T., & Wu, L.-F. (2020). Blockchain technology adoption behavior and sustainability of the business in tourism and hospitality SMEs: An empirical study. Sustainability, 12(3), 1256. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031256
  32. Ofem, U. J., Orim, F. S., Edam-Agbor, I. B., Amanso, E. O. I., Eni, E., Ukatu, J. O., Ovat, S. V., Osang, A. W., Dien, C., & Abuo, C. B. (2025). Teachers’ preparedness for the utilization of artificial intelligence in classroom assessment: The contributory effects of attitude toward technology, technological readiness, and pedagogical beliefs with perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness as mediators. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1568306
  33. Ofori, D., Light, O., & Ankomah, J. (2023). Adoption intentions of electronic procurement among public sector organisations (PSOs) in Ghana: Emerging economy perspective. Journal of Public Procurement, 23(2), 179-199. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-09-2022-0045
  34. Pentrakan, A., Wang, J.-Y., & Wong, W.-K. (2024). Factors influencing hospitals' willingness for pharmaceutical procurement via e-government platforms: A PLS-SEM Approach. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 2024 4th International Conference on Internet and E-Business, 21–26.
  35. Pujani, V., Dasman, H., Semiaty, R., & Nazir, R. (2021). Readiness model in adopting e-health: An indonesian experience. TEM Journal, 10(1), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM101-12
  36. Rahmawati, d., & Antoni, D. (2021). Faktor-faktor UMKM dalam Mengadopsi E-Market di Kabupaten Ogan Ilir (SME Factors in Adopting E-Market in Ogan Ilir Regency). Jurnal Bisnis dan Pemasaran Digital, 1(1), 13-31. https://doi.org/10.35912/jbpd.v1i1.455
  37. Rogers, E. M., & Williams, D. (1983). Diffusion of Innovation. The Free Press.
  38. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2020). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, & A. E. Vomberg (Eds.), In C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, & A. E. Vomberg (Eds.), Handbook of Market Research (pp. 1–47). Springer International Publishing (pp. 1-47).
  39. Singh, J., & Mansotra, V. (2019). Towards development of an integrated cloud-computing adoption framework—a case of Indian school education system. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 16(02), 1950016. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877019500160
  40. Sohaib, O., Hussain, W., Asif, M., Ahmad, M., & Mazzara, M. (2019). A PLS-SEM neural network approach for understanding cryptocurrency adoption. Ieee Access, 8, 13138–13150. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2960083
  41. Swani, K. (2021). To app or not to app: A business-to-business seller's decision. Industrial Marketing Management, 93, 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.05.033
  42. Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. MA: Lexington Books.
  43. Toufaily, E., Zalan, T., & Dhaou, S. B. (2021). A framework of blockchain technology adoption: An investigation of challenges and expected value. Information & Management, 58(3), 103444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103444
  44. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  45. Venkatesh, V., & Thong, J. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the association for Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00428
  46. Villalba-Mora, E., Casas, I., Lupiañez-Villanueva, F., & Maghiros, I. (2015). Adoption of health information technologies by physicians for clinical practice: The Andalusian case. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 84(7), 477-485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.03.002
  47. Wang, X., Liu, L., Liu, J., & Huang, X. (2022). Understanding the determinants of blockchain technology adoption in the construction industry. Buildings, 12(10), 1709. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101709
  48. Zhang, K., & Li, M. (2021). Teachers’ adoption of AI-based assessment tools in Chinese secondary schools: A study of perceived usefulness and ease of use. J. Educ. Comput. Res.(59), 1300–1322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633121992789
  49. Zhou, Z., Liu, D., Chen, Z., & Pancho, M. (2025). Government adoption of generative artificial intelligence and ambidextrous innovation. International Review of Economics & Finance, 98, 103953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.103953
License & Copyright
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.